Carnal Reason

I wholeheartedly agree with Jules Crittenden:

Iran has been meddling with murderous results in Iraq and Lebanon, two countries it prefers to see wracked with war and instable. Iran has declined to cease and desist. Iran wants to force us out of Iraq in the most humiliating way possible. Iran wants to dominate Iraq and Lebanon. It wants to use them as part of its plan to encircle and ultimately destroy Israel. It wants to control as much of the world’s oil supply as it can. It has been working aggressively and criminally toward those ends for decades.

Therefore, it is time to take this opportunity to reduce Iran’s capacity to make war. Its nuclear sites, its military facilities. The roads and bridges it uses to transport the materiel and personnel of its demonic foreign policy. It is an opportunity the Iranians are giving us, on a platter. It is not clear to me why we are not taking it.

Iran has calculated that we won’t act in defense of British sailors. I can’t imagine why we would allow Iran or anyone else to think we would not support our allies who have stood with us in combat as forcefully as we would if those were our own sailors.

There are those who think the sailors may be harmed if we take forceful action. That may be. Iran needs to be made aware that that would be extremely unwise course of action. But in war, there are sometimes casualties, and the fate of millions of people in wartime cannot be held hostage by concern for a handful of sailors and marines.

Iran further calculates that both George Bush and Tony Blair are politically marginalized and incapable of action. I am not sure why the mullahs think that. I don’t think they have really been paying attention to what is happening in Washington.

The only obstacles at this point, theoretically, are an ostrich-like Congress, a war-weary American people, and a tired Army.

We’ve already seen that a nearly evenly divided Congress, incapable of taking definitive action, not only can but must be ignored. The Congress that cannot uphold its own votes had no mandate to dictate terms to the president, particularly in perilous times that call for strong leadership. The American people I talk to, many of them no great fans of our president and our ongoing state of war, are exasperated with the Iranians and with Iraq. President Bush can explain it all after he launches the attack. The road to victory in Baghdad runs through Teheran, and Teheran is doing everything it can to block that road. We need to engage Iran, just as the Iraq Study Group correctly stated. Just not in the manner that strangely myopic group advised.

As for the Army, we don’t need to engage in a land war with Iran. We don’t care occupy Iran. We simply need to neuter it. If Iran chooses to respond in bellicose fashion, that really won’t represent much of a change. A conventional response by massed Iranian forces would be entertaining. Guess who wins that one. The unconventional attacks have been underway for a long time, and any heightened aggressive action by Iran’s proxies in Iraq, well, that would be a gift. An opportunity to destroy them.

This is not about George Bush’s pride or Tony Blair’s pride. The shameful legacy of Jimmy Carter, the master of dithering failure and humiliation, should be history by now. It is about restoring peace to the Middle East. And that is not going to happen as long as the Iranians believe they can behave with impunity in the manner they have been as recently as yesterday, last week, last month, and last year, for the last three decades.

A little war could go a long way. A little war with Iran is the key to achieving peace.

War with Iran is inevitable. I don’t see the point of putting it off. I am baffled by Britain’s pusillanimous response to Iran’s act of war. Then again, Iran once seized an American embassy and the US did nothing. The repercussions of that act of cowardice and irresponsibility still haunt us.

Posted on April 1st, 2007 by pwyll
Filed under: politics, war